In the 1930s there were quite a few major pro wrestling promoters among others Geo Relwyskow Sr, Atholl Oakeley and veteran from the 1900s Music Halls Wm Bankier.
Looks like Relw and Oak used the term of all-in wrestling to describe their style, when Bankier preferred more modest sounding professional freestyle wrestling. Hard to tell whether there was any difference between the two styles. More likely it was the same typical rough and tumble pro russlin we all know and love.
Yet the main question is still the same, who controlled which title, and who actually were the champs.
Any info or opinion on this matter would be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance to everyone for their feedbacks.
In the 1930s there were quite a few major pro wrestling promoters among others Geo Relwyskow Sr, Atholl Oakeley and veteran from the 1900s Music Halls Wm Bankier.
Looks like Relw and Oak used the term of all-in wrestling to describe their style, when Bankier preferred more modest sounding professional freestyle wrestling. Hard to tell whether there was any difference between the two styles. More likely it was the same typical rough and tumble pro russlin we all know and love.
Yet the main question is still the same, who controlled which title, and who actually were the champs.
Any info or opinion on this matter would be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance to everyone for their feedbacks.