Most Wrestling Matches we All watched Live or on T.V. usually had a 'Winner' and a
'Loser' didn't they? Now and again one Wrestler-often the Villain-would gain an early Score
only for the Opponent-often the Blue Eye-to 'manage' to find the Equaliser in the Last Round
-9/10 this was how the Script panned out for Matches ending in a Draw!
2-0 Wins were much more common in the 1950's!
But if Bouts were actually 'Real'-by the Law of Averages many more should have ended
with NEITHER Wrestler managing to get either a Fall or a Submission-
In Reality this was an 'unbelievable' Rarity!-Did Promoters think Punters would feel
'cheated' if too many Bouts had No Score Draws?-Would it have stopped them from
building the 'Story Lines'?- In my Years of Attending Live Shows I can only recall a small
handful of such Bouts!-And I've seen the odd few on T.V.!
Can Anyone remember seeing such No-Score Draws?-What about your Era BERNARD?
Did YOU see many of such Bouts/-Did you see ANY?
MAIN MASK
Last September DJ Mask wrote
No winning falls, submissions or knockouts.
In doing some research on the Itv wrestling site I came across a wrestling bill screened on 2/3/68 where none of the 4 televised bouts ended with a fall, submissions or a KO. Has anyone else been to the wrestling where all the bouts ended without a winning Fall, Submission or a KO.
The tag match between (The Royals and the Yorkshire Terriers) ended 0-0
Geoff Portz v John Cox ended 1-1
Alan Dennison v John Cox (The result was given to Dennison after RSF)
Chic Purvey v Ted Heath ended with both wrestlers being disqualified.
Read and join in the rest of the topic