So now I know what a shooter is, who were they?
It's been well documented that Les Kellet was a man more than capable of holding his own and obviously Kendo, Marty Jones etc but who else?
John Quinn?
Pat Roach?
Rocco?
Dave Finley?
Please no wrestlers from the 1920s etc because (as usual) I wont have a bleedin clue who you're talking about!
there's a lot being made by some about the shooters, but at the end of the day if they couldn't wrestle and entertain the paying public they soon found it hard to get regular bookings. Shooters had to adapt or find another way to bring in a regular
Lots of traffic for a post that’s deemed irrelevant by some. A little trick I’ve developed over the years with posts that don’t interest me is to simply not read em. Surely you can’t be that bored? there’s plenty of other things to do. I’m busier than a one armed juggler with crabs over here.
Or may be 'shooter' is just what they call a 'real fighter' not necessary a 'clean wrestler' (a man with glorious amateur wrestling background)...back to terminology jungles.
I would say any of the Lancashire Amateur Wrestling Association's former champs who turned pros. Among others: Joe Reid, Johnny Nelson, Jim Crompton, George Gregory and many others. Those were not just capable wrestlers but also championship caliber stars of amateur catch freestyle wrestling. Besides Lancashire amateur stars there were of course many British amateur champ catcheurs of the world's top level, among others N. Morell and Harold Angus.
Ron Historyo, who's in your shooterzzz list?
Yes, it's a real enigma to know what we think about this and how to express it.
I think that the majority of the chaps from the early days,up to the 70's could handle themselves in the ring if necessary.When Supermax took over a lot of them couldn't handle a squabble in Mothercare.It was just a matter of time as to when the fans got fed up with the old,fat,flabby,and ridiculous moves which took over.I did hear that Big Daddy could shoot with the best.......................with his 12 bore.Shirley was a passable wrestler,but never a shooter.
I think it does have some relevance inasmuch that the public were presented with a spectacle that was supposedly legit, a shoot.
It's logical that we should wonder who was really the best at the shoot sport. Even if the nature of the true shoot sport would not attaract millions of punters attention after the initial interest.
It's a fascinating ongoing enigma with surprising revelations such as Saxonwolf's that even Catweazle may have been a shooter!
Couldn't agree more Hack.Well said
We keep ending up down this shooters road but we are discussing professional wrestling. Was ability as a shooter of any great relevance. Surely it was more a case of doing the job you are being paid to do.
So just getting suckered once again into this and the sado-masochist that was Assirati, according to Robinson.
Did the two ever wrestle each other?
Also, based on the old boxing saying, "a good big 'un will always beat a good little 'un", then if you want to rank wrestlers and ask who would walk away as "king of the hill", then Billy Robinson would be up at the top, in my opinion.
Billy himself rated a few wrestlers, like Karl Gotch and George Gordienko. Big George was, according to most things I have read, naturally incredibly strong, and that would have to be a factor.
Anglo, "... It would be easier to make up the alternate non-shooter list including Catweazle, Dick Conlon and Black Jack Mulligan. Pure professionals..."
Catweazle was an amateur wrestler and knew how to wrestle, despite his comedy act and apparent ineptness. Black Jack Mulligan, the same.
I stand corrected 😉
Shooter is an overused term in wrestling. It does make for some fun stories, though. According to Robinson, the toughest guys he faced in shoot fights were street fighters because they were unpredictable.
I recently saw an interview on youtube given by Superstar Billy Graham. During his talk he stated how Billy Robinson had a reputation for hurting men for real during his contests. Graham went as far as threatening Robinson prior to their encounters that if he hurt him, Graham was prepared to slash Robinson with concealed razor blades taped to his fingers during their contests.
In other interviews it was stated that the only two real fights Robinson ever lost were because he was so inebriated he couldn’t defend himself properly. And that both wrestlers who beat Robinson quickly left the area the following day! Billy Robinson himself described Bert Assirati as both a masochist and a sadist, so not the type of opponent anyone would wish to face I would imagine.
Bruno Sammartino also recounted a tale where Antonio Inoki tried to shoot on him during a bout in Japan working for Giant Baba. Sammartino realised what was happening and used his superior strength to power out of a hold before it was fully applied. This was Inoki’s last fight for Baba’s promotion before he split away to form his own organisation. The word was that Karl Gotch (Inoki’s mentor) and Inoki conspired to demean Sammartino giving the public the idea that Inoki was the better, harder man and Baba’s promotion was second rate to Inoki’s new one. Baba fell out with both Gotch and Inoki over this and Sammartino said he lost respect for both Inoki and his mentor. Whereas Giant Baba was an honourable man until the end.
Possibly Sammy Lee
Yes, very good.
However, to take a distanced view of these so-called shooters, or as I call them technicians without a willing paying public to watch them, at that time, another problem I have with them is that so many pro wrestlers were, apparently, shooters.
Robinson, Joyce, Dempsey, Woods, Nagasaki, Martinelli, Foley, Riley, Henri Pierlot, Naylor, Marty Jones .... the list is endless.
Realistically, there had to be some good'uns south of Stockport and north of Lancaster:
Marino, Roach, Kidd, Robin, Heath, Howes, Charles, The Outlaw, Judo Pete, Judo Al, Assirati, Capelli, Mann ....
Not to mention wrestlers we are told were champion amateurs:
Bridges, Kendall, Bronson, Haward, Myers, Finlay, Tibor, Nicol ....
And then Yorkshire.
And then the boxers you didn't mess with like Maxine and Kincaid and Bruno.
It seems that the discussion of shooters is intended to bestow an air of invincibility on them. But when all is said and done, it seems like half the wrestlers we discuss were shooters or similar.
Shooters don't get automatically placed above the others because their rules are not elite, their rules are not professional wrestling rules. They are players without a playground. It would be easier to make up the alternate non-shooter list including Catweazle, Dick Conlon and Black Jack Mulligan. Pure professionals.
So it's not enough to say "Wow, he was a shooter" if so many were. For a useful discussion, maybe the shooters should be ranked. But what would the rules be - Saxonwolf can tell us, for sure.
If you put all of those named above into an MMA tourney, not to mention many others I haven't listed, imagined them to be equal weights and at their prime, who would step out of of the cage the overall champion?
Cheers Bill
Some good stuff there,as normal,Saxo.Thanks