Like several of you have already mentioned I thought Bert Royal was superb. To me he never looked clapped out always put on a good show. Seeing all the old posters it’s amazing how long and how far back their careers went, these posters show Kidd, Colbeck, McManus from the late forties. On a slightly different note what concerns me and I don’t think was good for professional wrestling was how long they stayed champions I don’t think this was good for the sport. You need a buzz , a constant change in the dynamics to keep the punters interested otherwise it becomes stale and predictable and folk loose interest. George Kidd, world champion till mid seventies but does not appear to have been very active, a world champion we just heard Kent talk about with reverence. Brian Maxine a champion from 1969 who made it plain with the addition of the title GOLDBELT Maxine that he was here to stay, and he was, long after tv wrestling was finished until the millennium and beyond. I am not talking about their ability maybe they were the best but to my mind it’s not good long term. Thank goodness there were also wrestlers like Jim Breaks who won, lost, and had feuds with the best of them Saint, Grey, Faulkner, Dynamite Kid, Danny Collins etc don’t you think he made the light divisions exciting and interesting partly due to their unpredictability? Fans were not certain how it would end and if the good guys like Saint, Grey would prevail, sometimes they did, sometimes not for that Breaks was great. But if you have say a Maxine who is a champ like....forever and usually is victorious with a single leg Boston submission how long will that keep fans coming? Personally I would have liked to see some of the unsung heroes like Mike Bennett or Alan woods etc a chance to shine. I remember Kent Walton saying of Robby Baron his ambition is the British middleweight title and thinking to myself dream on....